The Noahide Laws
Sanhedrin Calls on President Trump to Uphold Seven Noahide Laws

In an ancient and honored Jewish custom, the nascent Sanhedrin sent a letter to the new leader of the U.S., President Donald Trump, blessing him and calling on him to take the lead in restoring America and the world. The Sanhedrin also called on the new president to acknowledge and uphold the Seven Noahide laws.
The main problem with this is that these laws didn't come from Noah or God specifically for Gentiles. These were devised by select Rabbi in the push for their Jew World Order.
​
The letter follows the custom of the Jewish people to bless foreign kings as seen in a verse in Jeremiah, Rabbi Dov Stein, secretary of the Sanhedrin, told Breaking Israel News.
“And seek the peace of the city whither I have caused you to be carried away captive, and pray unto Hashem for it; for in the peace thereof shall ye have peace.” Jeremiah 29:7
Sanhedrin member Rabbi Yoel Shwartz expanded on the decision, pointing out the importance of Trump’s role. “We turned to President Trump because America functions as a world leader today in many things,” he told Breaking Israel News. “As such, we addressed the new president, asking him to fix things that Barack Obama broke, to bring back family values and to lead the war against radical Islamic terror.
“He has already made moves in the proper direction, and we bless him that he will continue to bring back the values that made America great,” praised Rabbi Shwartz. “We hope he will advance the Noahide laws that are incumbent upon all men.”
In recent events (May 2025), President Trump is realizing that Israel has been manipulating the USA to do its dirty work and to be a threat to their cousins, the Muslims, specifically Iran. Americans are waking up that we have been ruled as the United States of Israel instead of our own Sovereignty as the United States of America.
​
The prayer sent by the Sanhedrin to Trump is different from that usually recited by Jews living under foreign rule, Rabbi Stein explained.
“There was a version of the prayer that was said by Jews living under foreign kings, to appease the king in hopes that he will not oppress the Jews under his rule,” said Rabbi Stein. The prayer is still said in synagogues around the world and begins with a verse from Psalms.
“Who givest salvation unto kings, who rescuest David Thy servant from the hurtful sword.” Pslams 144:10
As suggested by the verse, the prayer is motivated by fear that a monarch ruling over Jews in exile would turn tyrannical and oppressive to the Jews who, as strangers in a strange land, depended on the king’s good will. But the Sanhedrin blessed Trump in a different tradition of blessing foreign monarchs which existed in "Biblical Israel." Keep in mind, today's Israel is not Biblical Israel other than the land itself, not the people that are there.
“We blessed him as an independent nation blessing a close ally,” said Rabbi Stein.
The Sanhedrin’s letter begins, “We thank God that a suitable man was chosen to lead America, whose values in the past symbolized a belief in God, and educated its people in morals and family values.”
The Sanhedrin then calls on President Trump to follow the Seven Noahide Laws, given by God as a binding set of laws for all of humanity. The Sanhedrin described the laws as a framework that will benefit all mankind.
The 7 Noahide Laws
1. Do not deny God.
2. Do not blaspheme God.
3. Do not murder.
4. Do not engage in illicit sexual relations.
5. Do not steal.
6. Do not eat from a live animal.
7. Create legal system of justice.
​
Note to readers: While it is commonly known as listed as seven laws, there are actually 66 of them. The full list is provided toward the end of this webpage.
“It is essential to return to the divine order that was given at Mount Sinai to all of Man, to the fundamental principle that is common courtesy and common sense preceding everything,” the letter emphasizes. “It is important to return to the seven guidelines given to Noah and his offspring that protect all human and moral obligations.”
The Sanhedrin also urges the president to adhere to his campaign promise of renewed support of Israel, including moving the US embassy to Jerusalem, so that Israel can fulfill its Biblical role as a light unto the nations.
“As an honorable President, you are aware of the importance of Israel as an ally, especially a cultural ally, of the United States. The whole world anticipates the instilling of Bible values – God’s morality given on Mount Sinai for all the world.
“We must work together so that these values ​​will be the inalienable property of all mankind,” the rabbinical body proposes.
The letter concludes with a final benediction for the world, but especially the two allies. “It is our prayer to God that our way will successfully bring welfare and happiness to all mankind, and especially to Israel and the United States, and all of humanity will benefit from this.”
___________________


Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson
On March 20th 1991, the United States Congress passed H.J Res 104, which was then signed into law by President George H. W. Bush and became Public Law No. 102-14. The language of the law asserts that the “Seven Noahide Laws” are the ethical values of civilized society and are the basis on which the American nation was founded and that without these Seven Noahide Laws society stands in peril. It is also stated that it is our nation’s “responsibility” to transmit these “ethical values” to the generations of the future and that in the future the President of the United States will sign an “international scroll” pledging to return the world to the Seven Noahide Laws through education and charity. The law also celebrates the birthday of one Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the leader of the Chabad-Lubavitch movement, who along with this organization has been dedicated to spreading and fostering the Seven Noahide Laws in society.
Notice the law is written in a very creative way, it states the Seven Noahide Laws are the “foundation” upon which American was founded, couldn’t someone argue that this statement makes the Noahide Laws actionable and enforceable? The law says it is our responsibility to transmit the values of these Seven Noahide Laws to the nation, could this be interpreted to mean we must begin education programs? The law also promises that our President will sign an “international scroll” pledging to return the world the values of the Noahide Laws, along with other heads of state; could this proclamation ever supersede American law? Before discussing what the Noahide Laws are, please take a moment to read Public Law No. 102-14 in full from the American Library of Congress website:
“Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation was founded; Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the bedrock of society from the dawn of civilization, when they were known as the Seven Noahide Laws; Whereas without these ethical values and principles the edifice of civilization stands in serious peril of returning to chaos; Whereas society is profoundly concerned with the recent weakening of these principles that has resulted in crises that beleaguer and threaten the fabric of civilized society; Whereas the justified preoccupation with these crises must not let the citizens of this Nation lose sight of their responsibility to transmit these historical ethical values from our distinguished past to the generations of the future; Whereas the Lubavitch movement has fostered and promoted these ethical values and principles throughout the world; Whereas Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement, is universally respected and revered and his eighty-ninth birthday falls on March 26, 1991; Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, `the rebbe’, this, his ninetieth year will be seen as one of `education and giving’, the year in which we turn to education and charity to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore, be it Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That March 26, 1991, the start of the ninetieth year of Rabbi Menachem Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as `Education Day, U.S.A.’. The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.
Speaker of the House of Representatives.
Vice President of the United States and President of the Senate.“
– Public Law 102-14, Library of Congress Website (Please Google “Public Law 102-14, Library of Congress”)
Public Law 102-14 also commemorates the birth of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson who promoted the Noahide Laws.
But what are the “Seven Noahide Laws”? How can we know what the law is asking of us if the Seven Noahide Laws have not been explained? One clue to this mystery lays in the fact that the law commemorates the birth of a Rabbi, Rabbi Schneerson; is it possible the Seven Noahide Laws have something to do with Judaism? Who is Rabbi Schneerson? Rabbi Schneerson is an extremely controversial Rabbi as he has stated that non-Jewish souls are “satanic” and that non-Jews have no other purpose than to serve Jews who are the reason for creation, the Rabbi believes this ownership on the part of Jews goes so far as that Jews own the fetus of non-Jews and thus non-Jews may not have abortions as the unborn child is Jewish property; Jews, however, are not punished for abortions since the adult Jew is the meaning of creation above the fetus of a Jew (here). This law is already offensive as it praises a Rabbi who obviously hates non-Jews, but what are the Seven Noahide Laws? To answer this question I turned to a respected source on the Jewish religion, the 1906 Jewish encyclopedia.
The 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia is an English language encyclopedia originally published in New York between 1901 and 1906 by Funk and Wagnalls, under the full title “The Jewish encyclopedia; a descriptive record of the history, religion, literature, and customs of the Jewish people from the earliest times to the present day.” It contains over 15,000 articles in 12 volumes on the history and then-current state of Judaism and the Jews.[A] Fortunately, the entire 12 volumes of the Jewish Encyclopedia has been uploaded online by The Kopelman Foundation. According to their website, one of the Kopelman Foundation’s missions is to “advance a deeper understanding of Judaism — its traditions, values and history — and help Jewish organizations make a positive contribution to contemporary public life.” [B] The Kopleman Foundation was founded by Josh Kopelman and his wife Rena Cohen. Josh Kopelman is an American entrepreneur, venture capitalist, and philanthropist most noted for founding the website www.half.com which he sold to ebay in 2002. Josh Kopleman also professes to be of the Jewish Religion. You can access his professional LinkedIn account (here). Seeing that Josh Kopleman is a professional business person, it is safe to assume that his digital version of the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia is authentic and worthy of quoting. You can access all 12 volumes of the Jewish Encyclopedia at www.jewishencyclopedia.com.
What does the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia Say About Noahide Law?
1906 Jewish Encyclopedia - LAWS, NOACHIAN
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/9679-laws-noachian
The Seven Noahide Laws: Jewish Religious Laws That Apply to All
According to the “Seven Laws” section of the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia, according to Judaism all human beings are the descendants of a man named Noah who along with his family survived a worldwide flood spoken of in the Bible. “Noahide” refers to “Noah”, the supposed to be father of all of humanity according to Jewish theology. According to the encyclopedia entry, Jewish Rabbis have determined that since we are all the children of Noah, and the Noahide Laws were given to him, they are binding upon all of humanity, not just “Israelites”. The section states that these Seven Noahide Laws are not found within the Old Testament of the Bible (Torah) but were introduced later in a book called the Talmud (a Jewish holy book) written by Rabbi's, NOT PROPHETS OF GOD. In the Old Testament, the Prophets were largely ignored by these Jews, or stoned to death by them. The purpose of the Talmud is to replace the Old Testament.
According to the entry, the Seven Noahide Laws are:
1) Do Not Worship Idols
2) Do Not Blaspheme
3) Establish Courts of Justice
4) Not To Kill
5) Not To Commit Adultery
6) Not To Rob
7) Not To Eat Flesh Cut From Living Animals
According to Judaism, the Noahide Laws against blasphemy, idolatry, adultery and the command to set up “courts of justice” are mandatory upon non-Jews just as they are Israelites. These are the laws which Public Law 102-14 states America was founded upon, but isn’t America supposed to be a secular nation, with separation of Synagogue and state? Why have Jewish religious law been adopted into our legal system? The above-mentioned laws would impinge on the rights and freedoms of others. Isn’t blasphemy, questioning or disparaging of a certain religion or god freedom of speech? What about Idolatry? Isn’t it one’s right to worship in whatever way they see fit, even if this includes using idols to commune with the heavens? And then there is adultery. We don’t all believe that adultery is a sin or should be abolished. What about these “courts of justice”, are these Jewish religious courts? There are already many questions that need to be answered about Jewish Noahide Law and Public Law 102-14.
The Seven Laws
Laws which were supposed by the Rabbis to have been binding upon mankind at large even before the revelation at Sinai, and which are still binding upon non-Jews. The term Noachian indicates the universality of these ordinances, since the whole human race was supposed to be descended from the three sons of Noah, who alone survived the Flood. Although only those laws which are found in the earlier chapters of the Pentateuch, before the record of the revelation at Sinai, should, it would seem, be binding upon all mankind, yet the Rabbis discarded some and, by hermeneutic rules or in accordance with some tradition (see Judah ha-Levi, “Cuzari,” iii. 73), introduced others which are not found there. Basing their views on the passage in Gen. ii. 16, they declared that the following six commandments were enjoined upon Adam: (1) not to worship idols; (2) not to blaspheme the name of God; (3) to establish courts of justice; (4) not to kill; (5) not to commit adultery; and (6) not to rob (Gen. R. xvi. 9, xxiv. 5; Cant. R. i. 16; comp. Seder ‘Olam Rabbah, ed. Ratner, ch. v. and notes, Wilna, 1897; Maimonides, “Yad,” Melakim, ix. 1). A seventh commandment was added after the Flood—not to eat flesh that had been cut from a living animal (Gen. ix. 4). Thus,the Talmud frequently speaks of “the seven laws of the sons of Noah,” which were regarded as obligatory upon all mankind, in contradistinction to those that were binding upon Israelites only (Tosef., ‘Ab. Zarah, ix. 4; Sanh. 56a et seq.).
​
While many additions were made to these laws by some of the tannaim—e.g., the prohibitions against eating the blood of a living animal, against the emasculation of animals, against sorcery, against pairing animals of different species, and against grafting trees of different kinds (ib. 56b)—so that in one place thirty Noachian laws are mentioned (Ḥul. 92a; comp. Yer. ‘Ab. Zarah ii. 1), the prevalent opinion in the Talmud is that there are only seven laws which are binding upon all mankind. In another baraita (Tanna debe Menasseh) the seven Noachian prohibitions are enumerated as applying to the following: (1) idolatry, (2) adultery, (3) murder, (4) robbery, (5) eating of a limb cut from a living animal, (6) the emasculation of animals, (7) the pairing of animals of different species (Sanh. 56b).
Punishment For Breaking Any Of The Seven Laws: Death By Decapitation
In the section “Laws Before Sinai” the 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia states that with few exceptions, the breaking of the Jewish Noahide Laws is punishable by death by decapitation. We also learn that Noahide Law sets up a two-tier legal system, one for Jews and one for non-Jews. “Noachids”, non-Jews who have willingly accepted these laws (sometimes known as Ger Toshav if they live inside the borders of Israel), are subjected to a different and less fair legal system than Jews. A Noachid/Ger Toshav can be sentenced to death with only one witness and by one judge (implying Jews are required more judges and witnesses to be condemned to death). Also, unlike Jews, the Noachid is not entitled to an official warning for their first transgression of the law. Noachids may be executed if they blaspheme even using a substitute for the name of god, but Jews must use the full official name of god when blaspheming to be condemned to death. Condemning someone to death for not following Jewish religious law is extreme and has nothing to do with American law. Also, there is an obvious inequality before the law, non-Jews are put at a disadvantage under Jewish Noahide Law in regards to trial and execution. Why has this law been enshrined in the US Federal Government? Why is it stated to be the “foundation” of our civilization? Why does the law beseech us to transmit the “values” of these Jewish Noahide Laws to the next generation of Americans and the world? Aren’t we supposed to stand for equality and justice for all?
Laws Before Sinai
With regard to the other laws which are mentioned in the Book of Genesis and which were not included among the Noachian laws, as, for instance, circumcision and the prohibition against eating of the “sinew that shrank,” the Rabbis laid down the following principle: “Every law that was enjoined upon the Noachidæ and was repeated at Sinai is meant to apply both to Israelites and to non-Israelites; laws that were enjoined upon the Noachidæ and were not repeated at Sinai apply to Israelites only” (Sanh. 59a; R. Jose ben Ḥanina; comp. Bacher, “Ag. Pal. Amor.” i. 430 and note). By this principle a number of the pre-Sinaitic laws were excluded from the Noachian laws, although it required a great deal of speculative reasoning to make this principle apply to all cases (Sanh. 59b).
​
In the elaboration of these seven Noachian laws, and in assigning punishments for their transgression, the Rabbis are sometimes more lenient and sometimes more rigorous with Noachidæ than with Israelites. With but a few exceptions, the punishment meted out to a Noachid for the transgression of any of the seven laws is decapitation, the least painful of the four modes of execution of criminals (see Capital Punishment). The many formalities of procedure essential when the accused is an Israelite need not be observed in the case of the Noachid. The latter may be convicted on the testimony of one witness, even on that of relatives, but not on that of a woman. He need have had no warning (“hatra’ah”) from the witnesses; and a single judge may pass sentence on him (ib. 57a, b; “Yad,” l.c. ix. 14). With regard to idolatry, he can be found guilty only if he worshiped an idol in the regular form in which that particular deity is usually worshiped; while in the case of blasphemy he may be found guilty, even when he has blasphemed with one of the attributes of God’s name—an action which, if committed by an Israelite, would not be regarded as criminal (ib. 56b; see Blasphemy).
“Courts of Justice”
According to the “Procedure” section, Noachids / Ger Toshav (which are all people of the world) are required to establish approved courts of justice in every city and province to judge people according to Noahide Laws and warn them against transgressions. But Noahide Law is Jewish religious law, why should non-Jews be required to set up courts to enforce Jewish Law? American courts are required to follow constitutional law, wouldn’t Public Law 102-14 create a conflict with this principle? If brought to the Supreme Court could Public Law 102-14 be ruled to supersede the Constitution, could the legal argument be made that we need to amend to Constitution to humor these laws? The section continues and further stipulations are made about the second-class status of Noachids (non-Jews). Jews who murder other people indirectly (i.e. “staving him”) are not sentenced to death, but Noachids are. Noachids are executed for stealing less than the smallest denomination of money while Jews are executed only for stealing larger amounts. Is this the kind of “justice” we are supposed to uphold in our courts?
Procedure
The Noachidæ are required to establish courts of justice in every city and province; and these courts are to judge the people with regard to the six laws and to warn them against the transgression of any of them (ib.; “Yad,” l.c. ix. 14, x. 11; comp. Naḥmanides on Gen. xxxiv. 13, where the opinion is expressed that these courts should judge also cases other than those coming under the head of the six laws, as, for example, larceny, assault and battery, etc.). In the case of murder, if the Noachid slay a child in its mother’s womb, or kill a person whose life is despaired of (“á¹erefah”), or if he cause the death of a person by starving him or by putting him before a lion so that he can not escape, or if he slay a man in self-defense, the Noachid is guilty of murder and must pay the death-penalty, although under the same circumstances an Israelite would not be executed (ib. 57b; “Yad,” l.c. ix. 4; comp. “Kesef Mishneh,” ad loc.).
​
Only six cases of what would ordinarily be illicit connection are forbidden to the Noachid: (1) with mother; (2) with father’s wife, even after the father’s death; (3) with a married woman, whether married to a Jew or to a non-Jew; (4) with sister by the same mother; (5) pederasty; (6) bestiality. In these cases also there are differences in the punishment inflicted, dependent upon whether the offenses are committed by a Noachid or by an Israelite (see “Yad,” l.c. ix. 5-8). The Noachid is punished with decapitation for all kinds of robbery, whether from a Jew or from a non-Jew, even though the article stolen is worth less than a peruá¹ah (the smallest Palestinian coin, for less than which no case can be instituted against an Israelite). The Noachid is executed also if he eat of a limb cut from a living animal, even though the quantity consumed be less than the size of an olive (the minimum portion for the eating of which an Israelite may be punished; “Yad,” l.c. ix. 9-13).
Secondary Status Of Noahides (Non-Jews)
In the “Special Exception” category it is further elaborated that a Noachid is not executed if he commits a crime unwittingly, but ignorance of the Law does not excuse him. A Noachid who: kills another Noachid, practices adultery with another Noachid, blasphemes or practices idolatry may be spared from execution if they convert to full Judaism. However, they cannot escape execution even upon conversion if they killed a Jew or practice adultery with a Jew. Those who willingly follow the Noahide Laws are regarded as “domiciled aliens”, “pious of the Gentiles”. Evidence that the Noahide Laws are to be implemented everywhere comes from the ending of the entry where foreign Babylon is chastised for not following all Seven Noahide Laws, a nation that existed on the other side of the Euphrates river and beyond the boundaries of Israel. Finally, we are told that in the “Messianic Age”, the Noachids will accept Torah and becomes Jews, but then rebel against it. Noahide Law obviously has everything to do with the Jewish religion and it is also obviously very biased in favor of Jewish people and biased against non-Jews. It is no surprise that Rabbi Schneerson who is applauded in Public Law 102-14 dedicated much of his life spreading acceptance of these laws and that his Jewish followers worked to have these laws very carefully entered into federal law.
Special Exceptions
The Noachid is free from punishment if he commits a sin unwittingly; ignorance of the Law, however, does not excuse him. If he commits a sin under duress, even one for which an Israelite is obliged to undergo martyrdom rather than transgress (e.g., idolatry, adultery, or murder), he is not liable to punishment (Mak. 9a; Sanh. 74b; “Yad,” l.c. x. 1, 2; comp. “Leḥem Mishneh” and “Kesef Mishneh,” ad loc.). A Noachid who slays another Noachid, or worships idols, or blasphemes, or has illicit connection with the wife of another Noachid, and then becomes a proselyte, is free from punishment. If, however, he has killed an Israeli (Sanh. 71b; “Yad,” l.c. x. 4).
A Noachid who wishes to observe any of the laws of the Torah is not prevented from doing so. With regard to the prohibition against a Noachid studying the Law or observing the Sabbath, see Gentile in Relation to Jews.
​
He who observed the seven Noachian laws was regarded as a domiciled alien (, ‘Ab. Zarah 64b; see Proselyte), as one of the pious of the Gentiles, and was assured of a portion in the world to come (Tosef., Sanh. xiii. 1; Sanh. 105a; comp. ib. 91b; “Yad,” l.c. viii. 11). In Talmudic times the non-Jews of Babylon were apparently sunk in the grossest immorality, so that ‘Ula, one of the earlierBabylonian amoraim, complains that out of the thirty laws (see above) which the Noachidæ accept they observe only three—they do not write a marriage contract (“ketubah”) for pederasty; they do not sell human flesh in their shops; and they show respect for the Torah (Ḥul. 92b).
In the Messianic age the Noachidæ will accept all the laws of the Torah, although later they will again reject them (Yer. ‘Ab. Zarah ii. 1).
​
Bibliography:
Hamburger, R. B. T. ii., s.v. Noachiden;
Hirschfeld, Pflichten und Gesetze der Noachiden, in Kobak’s Jeschurun, iv. 1-19;
Levinsohn, Zerubbabel, ii. 74-87, Warsaw, 1878;
Weber, System der Altsynag. Paläst. Theologie, § 56, Leipsic, 1880;
Zweifel, Sanegor, pp. 269 et seq., Warsaw, 1894.
Why Do We Want To Repeal
Public Law 102-14?
Public Law 102-14 is a religious law, a Jewish religious law, and in the United States, we work under a government where there is an official separation of Synagogue (Church) and State. Public Law 102-14 defines the Seven Noahide Laws as the “foundation” of our civilization, even though there is no evidence that the United States was founded on Jewish Law. The law also requires we transmit the “ethics” of Jewish Noahide Law to the next generation and encourage (coerce) other nations to adopt the Seven Noahide Laws as well. Noahide Law is not just religious law, it is also very discriminatory and biased. The law abolishes “idolatry,” “blasphemy” and “adultery” on pain of death (by Guillotine), but these are Jewish supremacist rules, not humane or even logical rules. It also requires that all people of the world set up “courts of justice” to enforce these discriminatory laws, Noahide religious courts, not secular courts. Beyond this, Noahide Law is extremely biased in favor of Jewish people, providing them with special dispensations and greater legal protection against prosecution and execution than it does non-Jews (Noachids). These are the reasons why we need to Stop Noahide Law and repeal Public Law 102-14.
Works Sited
[A] “The Jewish Encyclopedia”. New York Times. August 16, 1902. Retrieved March 17, 2014.
[B] http://www.kopelman.org/mission.html
[C] Laws, Noachian. 1906 Jewish Encyclopedia.
http://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/9679-laws-noachian
Labels: #StopNoahideLaw
Before “sleepy” Joe Biden was President of the USA, he was a Senator and politician for forty years. His dubious work started in this record of history which would bring it before President H. W. Bush to sign onto the books. This is part of the history that needs to be shown. The details of how this would be ultimately passed by deception will follow this record.
Sponsored by Senator Joe Biden, Jr. (DE) 03/25/92
The Senate on 04/01/92 passed a companion measure HJ.RES410 in lieu of this measure by Voice Vote.
​
S.J.Res.279 — 102nd Congress (1991-1992)
SJ 279 IS
102d CONGRESS, 2d Session, S. J. RES. 279
Designating April 14, 1992, as `Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A.
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
March 25, 1992
Mr. BIDEN introduced the following joint resolution; which was read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary:
JOINT RESOLUTION
Designating April 14, 1992, as `Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A.'.
Whereas Congress recognizes the historical tradition of ethical values an principles which are the basis of civilized society and upon which our great Nation, the United States of America, was founded; Whereas President George W. Bush, distinguished leader of our great Nation, stated `Ethical values are the foundation for civilized society. A society that fails to recognize or adhere to them cannot endure.'; Whereas these ethical values and principles have been the cornerstone of society since the dawn of civilization when they were known as the Seven Noahide laws; Whereas the Government of the United States and its citizens are committed to the ideals of social equality and the right of each and every person to share in the bounty the world has to offer--ideals deeply rooted in our Nation's history and boldly affirmed by the miraculous changes of the past year; Whereas our Nation has recently witnessed the beginning triumph of these values through wonders around the world of biblical proportions; Whereas the end of the Cold War heralds the beginning of an era where individual rights and human dignity become paramount and where the dream of a world in which material and spiritual deprivation is replaced by human kindness and compassion becomes a reality; Whereas the absolute necessity of mutual responsibility and concern for the needy has been of particular concern to `the Rebbe', Rabbi Menachem M. Schneerson, leader of the Lubavitch movement; Whereas the Lubavitch movement, through the establishment of over 1,000 social welfare and educational institutions throughout the world under the leadership of the `Rebbe', has long supported and promoted dedication to education and selfless concern for others; Whereas Rabbi Menachem M. Schneerson has recently issued a worldwide call for a revitalized dedication to loving kindness, charity, and sharing between man and his fellow man; Whereas Rabbi Menachem M. Schneerson is universally revered by all faiths, respected as spiritual leader of world Jewry, and his 90th birthday falls on April 14, 1992; Whereas in tribute to this great spiritual leader, `the Rebbe', his birthday will be designated as `Education Sharing Day U.S.A.' and this year, his 91st, will mark a new beginning in an age-old commitment to education, accompanied by an increase in general acts of sharing with another, in order to return the world to the moral and ethical values contained in the Seven Noahide Laws; and Whereas this will be reflected in an international scroll of honor signed by the President of the United States and other heads of state: Now, therefore, be it.
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That April 14, 1992, the birthday and the start of the 91st year of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, leader of the worldwide Lubavitch movement, is designated as `Education and Sharing Day, U.S.A.'. The President is requested to issue a proclamation calling upon the people of the United States to observe such day with appropriate ceremonies and activities.

Israel is a nation of its people. Those people are Israeli's. Today's land mass does not contain the people from the Old Testament. A Jew was from the tribe of Judah. That tribe was overthrown. Today the word Jew is thrown around as if it is an existing nationality. Zionism is the ideology that Israel is a nation of the Jew. However the thought process originated from Theodore Herzl who was a secular person and the goal for Israel was for it to be secular state which is exactly what it is today. Note the establishment of a Zionist Congress in the advertisement.
Your U.S. government can now legally kill Christians for the “crime” of
worshipping Jesus Christ! How did this really happen?
A diabolic deception has been perpetrated on the American people by their OWN leaders, Senators and Congressmen, who have sold their soul to the devil. On March 5, 1991, in the House of Representatives, and March 7, 1991, in the U.S. Senate, without any knowledge of, or input by, the people of the United States, U.S. Senators and Congressmen passed a law that is so outrageous — and frankly unconstitutional — that it forces the American people to be bound by a set of monstrous rules, called the Noahide Laws, rules that make the belief in Jesus Christ a crime punishable by decapitation by guillotine! On March 20, 1991, President George H. W. Bush, a supposed Christian, signed the bill into law. (Deanna’s note: President George W. Bush follows in his father’s footsteps. See A Free Press, A Free Pass)
​
Before you respond, “NO, that cannot be — not in our free country!” let me explain.
The passage of this law, HJ Res. 104, is especially troublesome to me because I was a member of the U.S. House of Representatives at the time it was passed. Even worse, I was in the House Chamber the very day that is was passed, voting on other legislation. Yet I, as a U.S. Congressman, had NO KNOWLEDGE that it had been passed or even that it was to be brought up for a vote. How could this be? How could the deception be so pervasive that those of us who had sworn to uphold our country’s Constitution, particularly those of us (few, indeed) who really took our position seriously as the protectors of the people, could be totally in the dark regarding the content of this bill and its passage by the leaders of this country — by treachery and deceit? Here’s how it happened!
​
On January 31, 1991, an innocuous-sounding Resolution was introduced, designating March 26, 1991 as “Education Day, USA.” It was purposely given this name to deceive the American people. It was, in fact, a Double Deception because not only did the Resolution have nothing to do with “Education,” it was also deceptively billed as a vehicle for recognizing the eighty-ninth birthday of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson. But in truth, the Resolution was nothing less than a secret, under-handed plot to control the American people by the Noahide Laws — a subterfuge for the elimination of Christianity, the elimination of all Christians, and the enslavement of all remaining “Gentiles.”
The Resolution, first introduced by Minority Leader, Rep. Robert H. Michel of Illinois, was then referred to the House Post Office and Civil Service Committee. Early in March 1991, 225 members of the House had signed on as co-sponsors of this Resolution, but it is highly doubtful they were given the full text of the document. They were probably told only that it was a Resolution in honor of Rabbi Schneerson’s birthday. Most likely they had no knowledge that the treacherous Noahide Laws were a silent attachment. I was not one of the co-sponsors. The committee referred this Resolution to the House for a vote on March 5, 1991. But here is where the real treachery begins! The record states that the House of Representatives passed this Resolution by “Unanimous Consent.” But what the average American does not know is that “Unanimous Consent” is a euphemism for getting a bill passed “under the radar” with almost NO ONE present to vote AND with NO RECORD of who voted or HOW they voted.
A Congressman’s ears prick up when he hears the words “Unanimous Consent” because he is aware that this may be a signal for skullduggery. And in this case, it most certainly was! On the day this Resolution was “passed,” the entire membership of the House of Representatives had already been dismissed after having been told that the day’s work, including all the voting, was over. We could all go home. It was THEN, after virtually ALL members had left, that the traitorous authors of this Resolution brought it up for a vote on the House floor — with only four hand-picked members present. It was then deceitfully “passed” by “Unanimous Consent” on March 5, 1991, by voice vote with almost NO ONE there and NO RECORD made of their names or how they voted. Two days later, on March 7 1991, the U.S. Senate passed the Resolution by voice vote, also with no recorded vote. On March 20, 1991, it was signed by President George H. W. Bush and became Public Law 102–14.
​
The words “Seven Noahide Laws” are mentioned twice in this Resolution. But completely missing from this Resolution are the following:
​
1. WHAT IS THE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE OF THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS?
2. WHO DRAFTED THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS AND WHERE DID THEY COME FROM?
3. WHEN WERE THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS DRAFTED?
4. WHO DEFINES WHAT THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS MEAN? WHAT IS THE PENALTY FOR VIOLATING THEM? WHO WILL ADMINISTER THEM?
5. “MAN’S” SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS VS. GOD’S TEN COMMANDMENTS.
6. TO WHOM DO THESE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS APPLY AND WHO MAKES THAT DECISION?
7. IS HJ RES. 104, CONTAINING THE SEVEN NOAHIDE LAWS CONSTITUTIONAL?
​
Jews, who by their financial contributions to members of Congress, claim they control what Congress will or will not do. A look at the recent history of U.S. politics confirms this. “He who has the gold — rules!”
​
Stephen Sizer, author of the book, Christian Zionism, first published in 2004, states:
“The Unity Coalition for Israel (UCFI) is probably the most recent network of Christian Zionists to be formed in the US yet it is already the largest and most powerful. The UCFI was founded by Esther Levens, a Jew, in Kansas in 1994 and now comprises a broad coalition of 200 different and autonomous Jewish and Christian organizations representing 40 million members who are ‘dedicated to a secure Israel’. Their principal strategy is to lobby the US media and political establishment, to challenge what they term ‘disinformation and propaganda’ and to express ‘the truth about Israel’. The UCFI includes three of the largest Christian Zionist organizations: Bridges for Peace, the International Christian Embassy Jerusalem, and Christians for Israel."
​
This coalition has a major influence on both the Republican and Democratic parties by providing the bulk of campaign funding to both sides. Aluf Ben, a spokesman for Shimon Peres, was quoted in Ha’aretz, a leading newspaper in Israel, as claiming that sixty percent of all financial help to Democrats came from Jewish sources.’ According to the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, ‘most pro-Israel fund-raisers estimate that at least 60 to 90 percent of Democratic campaign funding comes from Jewish sources, which also supply perhaps 40 percent of Republican funding’. Christian Zionists have also been influential in forging a closer relationship with Israel by facilitating solidarity pilgrimages and educational tours to the Holy Land.” (page 215)
​
Jewish lobbyists were successful in enlisting Minority Leader, Congressman Bob Michael, to be the chief sponsor of this resolution purportedly to honor and recognize Rabbi Schneerson, the leader of the Lubavitch movement, on his eighty-ninth birthday.
​
These lobbyists wanted to eliminate, for obvious reasons, any chance for discussion of the seven questions written above in this report. Specifically, the Bible, with particular reference in this instance to the Ten Commandments written by God, is the source of the ethical values and principles which are the basis of civilized society, not the Seven Noahide Laws, written by man.
​
To avoid this debate and the recorded vote that would have followed, a strategy was devised to get Resolution 104 adopted by “unanimous consent” with no documentation that 99% of all House members were absent, and none of the four members that were present would be held accountable by a recorded vote.
​
The Journal of the House of Representatives (JHR) for March 5, 1991, on page 151, describes item 30.12 H Res. 95- Unfinished Business. This Resolution commended the President and United States and allied military forces in the success of Operation Desert Storm. A recorded vote was taken and Item 30.13 describes the count: Yeas 410, Nays 8. My yes vote was among the 410. This page contains the name of each member present and how he or she voted.
​
Item 30.14, on the next page (page 152) of the JHR, recorded the announcement that when the House adjourns, it will meet on Wednesday, March 6, at 12 noon. This told all the members that there would be no more roll call votes on Tuesday, March 5, that the day’s business was over, and within minutes after this announcement, virtually all the members were off the House floor, on their way home, and totally unaware of anything thereafter that was brought up.
Here is the subsequent record of what took place AFTER the members were gone. Item 30.15 of the JHR was a routine announcement concerning recesses and a joint session with the President of the United States:
​
But then after almost everyone was gone for the day, Item 30.16 on the agenda, HJ Res. 104, the Resolution in question, was surreptitiously brought up on the House floor with only four members present, who spoke on behalf of the Resolution. This is how it occurred:
Congressman Thomas Sawyer (D-OH), the Chairman of the Committee on Post Office and Civil Service asked for “unanimous consent” to take up HJ Res. 104. Congressman Thomas Ridge (R-PA) reserved the right to object, but did not object. If he had objected, it would have stopped the process of unanimous consent. Instead, he acknowledged the work of Minority Leader Michel who was the chief sponsor of this legislation and he then yielded to (Jewish) Congressman Benjamin Gilman (R-NY). Congressman Gilman spoke briefly as did Minority Leader Michel. It appears likely that these four Congressmen were the only ones present.
After assisting with the underhanded passage of HJ Res. 104, Congressman Thomas Ridge also subsequently assisted in the cover up of the truth of 9/11, claiming that flight #93 crashed in Pennsylvania, even though NO parts of an airplane or passengers or baggage were ever found. From then on Thomas Ridge’s career blossomed! At the time of 9/11, Ridge was Governor of Pennsylvania (1995–2001). But in 2003, Ridge was named the First Secretary of the new Department of Homeland Security (2003–2005). After the tragic multiple shootings at Virginia Tech on April 16, 2007, Ridge became part of the committee to cover up what actually happened in that event.
Continuing with the debacle of the “Noahide Laws” passage, the Speaker pro tempore asked if there was any objection to the request from Congressman Sawyer. There was no objection.
​​
The Jews claim that with their financial contributions they have bought control of the U.S. Congress, and so they have. As proof of this statement no one needs to search further than the blunt words of Israeli Prime Minister, Ariel Sharon, uttered on October 3, 2001 to his colleague, Shimon Peres:
“Every time we do something, you tell me America will do this and will do that…I want to tell you something very clear: Don’t worry about American pressure on Israel. We, the Jewish people, control America, and the Americans know it.”
Indeed, the Jews had “bought” control of the House and Senate which resulted in ignoring the whole concept of accountability that the presence of debate and a roll call vote accomplishes. Bringing up HJ Res. 104 for passage at a time when the process selected assured that no more than four members of the House of Representatives were present, each of whom was committed to the passage of HJ Res. 104, guaranteed that when the request for unanimous consent was expressed on the floor of the House, no one was around to object. And because no one objected, passage was obtained with no member having his or her vote recorded in favor of or against the Resolution. By design there was no roll call vote and thus no member was held accountable for what Congress did. This is a prime example of the fraud perpetrated on the American people by their so-called “Representatives.” The oft quoted cliché is operating here, “With friends like these, who needs enemies?”
​
On the website of the Orthodox Jewish, Chabad-Lubavitch group, chabad.org, — one of the largest and most powerful Jewish organizations in the world and whose spiritual leader, Rabbi Menachen Mendel Schneerson, whose birthday honoring was the false flag cover-up for signing into law the authority to murder Christians for worshiping Jesus Christ—we find the following statement, accompanied by citations from the Talmud:
​
“The Talmud (Babylonian edition) records other sins of ‘Jesus the Nazarene.’
1. ‘He and his disciples practiced sorcery and black magic, led Jews astray into idolatry, and were sponsored by foreign, gentile powers for the purpose of subverting Jewish worship (Sanhedrin 43a).’”
2. “He was sexually immoral, worshipped statues of stone (a brick is mentioned), was cut off from the Jewish people for his wickedness, and refused to repent (Sanhedrin 107b; Sotah 47a).”
3. “He learned witchcraft in Egypt…(Shabbos 104b).” (End quote from Chabad-Lubavitch).
More quotes from the Talmud about Jesus
Gitten 57a says Jesus is in hell, being boiled in “hot excrement.”
Sanhedrin 43 says Jesus was executed because he practiced sorcery: “It is taught that on the eve of Passover Jesus was hung, and forty days before this the proclamation was made: Jesus is to be stoned to death because he has practiced sorcery and has lured the people to idolatry…He was an enticer and of such thou shalt not pity or condone.”
Genocide Advocated by the Talmud
Soferim 15, Rule 10. This is the saying of Rabbi Simon ben Yohai” Tob shebe goyyim harog (“Even the best of the gentiles should all be killed”).
This Talmudic passage has been concealed in some translations.
The Jewish Encyclopedia states, “…in the various versions the reading has been altered, ‘The best among the Egyptians’ being generally substituted.” In the Soncino version: “the best of the heathens” (Monor Tractates, Soferim 41a-b). But “heathen” is translated as “Gentile” (non-Jews) by the Jews.
Talmudic Doctrine: Non-Jews are not Human
The Talmud specifically defines all who are not Jews as non-human animals, and specifically dehumanizes Gentiles as not being descendants of Adam.
Moses Maimonides:
Advocate of Extermination
The rabbinic teacher Moses Maimonides called the “Rambam” by the Jews, is revered in Judaism as a supreme “sage” of the highest stature.
“Moses Maimonides is considered the greatest codifier and philosopher in Jewish history. He is often affectionately referred to as the Rambam, after the initials of his name and title, Rabenu Moshe Ben Maimon, “our Rabbi, Moses son of Maimon.”
According to the introduction to the book, Maimonides’ Principles, p. 5, Maimonides “spent twelve years extracting every decision and law from the Talmud, and arranging them all into 14 systematic volumes. The work was finally completed in 1180, and was called Mishnah Torah, or “Code of the Torah.”
Here is what Maimonides taught concerning the saving of the life of a Gentile or Christian, and even Jews who dared to deny the “divine inspiration” of the Talmud:
“Accordingly, if we see an idolater (gentile) being swept away or drowning in the river, we should not help him.”
​​
Maimonides ruled that it is a Jewish court — or a court appointed by Jewish authority — that enforces obedience and passes judgment on Gentiles, as well as promulgating legislation by court order for that purpose. Maimonides further decreed that any non-Jewish nation “not subject to our jurisdiction” (tahaht yadeinu) will be the target of Jewish holy war.
These courts are to be convened allegedly under the “Noahide Laws” (proscriptions against idolatry supposedly based on the covenant with Noah). But there is nothing in the Bible to support this claim. This claim is a preposterous FRAUD — and a sign of the anti-Christ!
Prof. Easterly of the Southern University Law Center, a Jewish legal expert, has diabolically compared HJ Res. 104 to the “first rays of dawn” which “evidence the rising of a still unseen sun.”
The Jewish Encyclopedia envisages a Noahide regime as a possible world order (One World Government) immediately preceding the “universal reign of the Talmud.” A terrifying prospect, indeed!
These provisions of the Talmud, the same Talmud that is the source of the Noahide laws, make very clear why the proponents of HJ Res. 104 used the subterfuge of obtaining the passage of this legislation without any debate or a recorded vote. HJ Res. 104 was fraudulently and deceitfully passed by “unanimous consent” when no one was around to consider and discuss the provisions of the Talmud. If these had been brought to the attention of the members of Congress, HJ Res. 104 would never have been passed.
​
The Chabad Lubavitch falsely claims that God gave the Seven Noahide Laws at Mt. Sinai with the intention that the Children of Israel should keep them and teach them to the Gentiles. This is a deliberate lie!
​
There is absolutely no support in the Bible for this fraudulent claim. The Source of these Seven Noahide Laws was NOT, as the Jews have claimed, directions from God to Adam — or Noah — or Moses. Their source is the Oral Traditions of the Pharisees that began in Babylon after the Israelites were captured in 586 BC.
​
​A Jewish website, www.NoahideNations.com, states that the worship of any deity other than God, which includes Jesus Christ, is idolatry. The penalty for idolatry is decapitation.
​
The Noahide Laws will be administered by a restored Sanhedrin, the ruling body of Jews that found Jesus Christ guilty of blasphemy on the accusations of two false witnesses according to Matthew 26:60. Under the “Courts of Law” section of the Noahide Laws this is stated:
​
“A person may be convicted in a Noahide court on the testimony of single witness, but only if the witness is known to be righteous.”
​
It is God’s Law, the Ten Commandments, that is the basis of civilization, NOT the Noahide Laws written by the killers of Christ — the Pharisees.
The Ten Commandments are found in Exodus 20: 1–17 and were written by God in his own finger on two tablets of stone, to show their permanence. God wrote these Commandments shortly after the Exodus that began in 1445 BC.
Although false claims have been made by the Jews that the origin of the Noahide Laws began with Adam, and included Noah and Moses, Jewish Professor Segal stated that the evidence of history proves that the origin of the Seven Noahide Laws is the Babylonian Traditions!
The captivity and removal to Babylon of the Northern tribes Judah and Benjamin occurred in 586 BC.
In other words, at least 859 years after God gave the Ten Commandments to mankind on Mt. Sinai, the Pharisees, the cultural progeny of the killers of Christ, in exile in Babylon, drafted the Seven Noahide Laws which were written by “man,” NOT by GOD!
In examining the history of the Seven Noahide Laws, no claim is made that God wrote them or that He wrote them with His own finger as He did the Ten Commandments.
​
The two tablets of stone containing the Ten Commandments written by God, were housed inside the Ark of the Covenant. (2 Chronicles 5:10, 1 Kings 8:9) The ordinances, written by Moses on parchment paper were housed in a side pocket on the outside of the Ark of the Covenant. (Deuteronomy 31:26).
When Jesus died on the cross He abolished the ordinances written by Moses (housed on the outside of the Ark of the Covenant) including the sanctuary-related ordinances that looked forward to the sacrificial lamb, Jesus Christ, and thus were abolished when these were fulfilled with the crucifixion of Christ. But the ordinances did NOT include the Ten Commandments. The ordinances were totally separate from the Ten Commandments.
No trace of a claim by anyone has been found which asserts that the Seven Noahide Laws were inside or on the outside of the Ark of the Covenant or anywhere during the Israelites sojourn in the wilderness. This fact is not surprising since the Seven Noahide Laws were first developed as a part of the Babylonian Talmud long after the exile of the Israelites to Babylon in 586 BC.
Exodus 20:3–17, contains the Ten Commandments:
3 Thou shalt have no other gods before me.
4 Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.
5 Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the LORD thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;
6 And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.
7 Thou shalt not take the name of the LORD thy God in vain; for the LORD will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.
8 Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.
9 Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:
10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:
11 For in six days the LORD made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the LORD blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.
12 Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee.
13 Thou shalt not kill.
14 Thou shalt not commit adultery.
15 Thou shalt not steal.16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.17 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour’s wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour’s.​
What God gave in these texts to the Children of Israel was clearly conditional. In the 23rd Chapter of Matthew, Jesus properly brought to account the Scribes and Pharisees for not keeping the covenant, the Ten Commandments. No better proof of the total rejection of the covenant was the actions of the Jews to call for the crucifixion of Jesus Christ.
The only reason the Pharisaical leaders of the Jews did not directly order Jesus’ death, was that they did not have the legal authority to do so. They were under Roman rule and only a Roman ruler could order the death penalty for any person. So they pressured Pilate (who said “I find NO FAULT in this “man” (Jesus)) to order the Jews’ murderous demand.
​
Many Christian leaders claim that the Ten Commandments were done away with at the Cross and only those commandments that Christ specifically mentioned in the New Testament are to be kept by “New Testament Christians.”
​
This is their justification for ignoring the Fourth Commandment which is God’s command that we keep holy the Sabbath day (Saturday NOT Sunday) as the Sabbath.
The Noahide Dinim Sub-Laws (Full list of 66 laws)
According to Rabbi Dr. Aaron Lichtenstein; based on the Rambam [52 Negative, 14 Positive]
1. No Idolatry
2. No blasphemy
3. No theft
4. No murder
5. No adultery
6. Courts of Justice
7. No limb of an animal
​
I. No Idolatry
1 "Against entertaining the thought that there exists a deity except HaShem."
Negative Mitzvah 1
Exodus 20:3 — "You shall have no other gods besides Me"
2 "Against making any graven image [& against having anyone else make one for us]."
Negative Mitzvah 2
Exodus 20:3 — "You shall have no other gods besides Me"
3 "Against making idols for use by others."
Negative Mitzvah 3
Leviticus 19:4 — "Do not make gods out of metal, for yourselves"
4 "Against making any forbidden statues [even when they are for ornamental purposes]."
Negative Mitzvah 4
Exodus 20:20 — "Do not make with Me gods of silver, neither shall you make for yourselves gods of gold"
5 "Against bowing to any idol [& not to sacrifice nor to pour libation nor to burn incense before any idol, even where it is not the customary manner of worship to the particular idol]."
Negative Mitzvah 5
Exodus 20:5 — "Do not bow down to them"
6 "Against worshipping idols in any of their customary manners of worship."
Negative Mitzvah 6
Exodus 20:5 — "Do not worship them"
7 "Against causing our children to pass [through the fire] in the worship of Molech." In ancient times, the worship of "Molech" - an Ammonite G-d - was very common, and it required that children be used for the ritual ceremony.
Negative Mitzvah 7
Leviticus 18:21 —"Do not give any of your children to set them apart to Molech"
8 "Against practicing Ov." [Ov is Divination using a mantra to obtain a meditative trance to commune with the dead]
Negative Mitzvah 8
Leviticus 19:31 — Do not turn to mediums"
9 "Against practicing Yiddoni." [A Yiddoni involves ritual acts and meditation as a means of imaginary prophecy]
Negative Mitzvah 9
Leviticus 19:31 — "Do not turn to oracles"
10 "Against turning to idolatry [in word, in thought, in deed, or by any observance that may draw us to its worship]."
Negative Mitzvah 10
Leviticus 19:4 — "Do not turn to idols"
​
II. No blasphemy
1 "To acknowledge the existence of G-d."
Positive Mitzvah 1
Exodus 20:2 — "I am the L-rd, your G-d"
2 "To fear G-d."
Positive Mitzvah 4
Deuteronomy 6:13 — "You shall fear the L-rd, your G-d"
3 "To pray to Him."
Positive Mitzvah 5
Exodus 23:25 — "And you shall serve the L-rd, your G-d"
4 "To sanctify G-d's name [in face of death, where appropriate]."
Positive Mitzvah 9
Leviticus 22:32 — "But I will be sanctified among the Children of Israel"
5 "Against desecrating G-d's name [even in face of death, when appropriate]." "Chillul HaShem"
Negative Mitzvah 63
Leviticus 22:32 — "Neither shall you profane My holy name"
6 "To study the Torah."
Positive Mitzvah 11
Deuteronomy 6:7 — "And you shall teach them diligently to your children."
7 "To honour the scholars, and to revere one's teacher."
Positive Mitzvah 209
Leviticus 19:32 — "You shall stand up before an elderly person and give respect to a sage"
8 "Against blaspheming.," "Birkat HaShem"
Negative Mitzvah 60
Exodus 22:27 — "Do not curse G-d"
​
III. No theft
1 "Against stealing, [i.e., by stealth]"
Negative Mitzvah 244
Leviticus 19:11 — "Do not steal"
2 "Against committing robbery, [i.e., openly]"
Negative Mitzvah 245
Leviticus 19:13 — "Do not commit robbery"
3 "Against shifting a landmark."
Negative Mitzvah 246
Deuteronomy 19:14 — "You shall not remove your neighbor's boundary marker"
4 "Against cheating."
Negative Mitzvah 247
Leviticus 19:13 — "You shall not defraud your neighbor"
5 "Against repudiating a claim of money owed."
Negative Mitzvah 248
Leviticus 19:11 — "You shall not reply falsely"
6 "Against overcharging."
Negative Mitzvah 250
Leviticus 25:14 — "You shall not defraud one another"
7 "Against coveting."
Negative Mitzvah 265
Exodus 20:14 — "You shall not covet your neighbor's house"
8 "Against desiring."
Negative Mitzvah 266
Deuteronomy 5:18 — "You shall not desire your neighbor's house"
9 "A labourer shall be allowed to eat of the fruits among which he works [under certain conditions]."
Positive Mitzvah 201
Deuteronomy 23:2 — "When you come (to work) in your neighbor's vineyard, you may eat the grapes...you may Pluck the ears"
10 "Against a labourer eating of such fruit [when certain conditions are not met]."
Negative Mitzvah 267
Deuteronomy 23:26 — "You shall not waive a sickle to your neighbor's standing grain"
11 "Against a labourer taking of such fruit home."
Negative Mitzvah 268
Deuteronomy 23:25 — "When you come into your neighbor's vineyard, then you may eat your fill of grapes at your desire; but you shall not put any in your container"
12 "Against kidnapping."
Negative Mitzvah 243
Exodus 20:13 — "Do not steal"
13 "Against the use of false weights & measures."
Negative Mitzvah 271
Leviticus 19:35 — "You shall do no unrighteousness in judgment; in length, in weight or in measure"
14 "Against the possession of false weights & measures."
Negative Mitzvah 272
Deuteronomy 25:13 — "You shall not have in your bag diverse weights, one large and one small"
15 "That one shall be exact in the use of weights & measures."
Positive Mitzvah 208
Leviticus 19:36 — "Honest balance, honest weights, an honest dry measure and an honest liquid measure, you shall have"
16 "That the robber shall return [or pay for] the stolen object."
Positive Mitzvah 194
Leviticus 5:23 — "He shall return that which he stole"
​
IV. No murder
1 "Against any person murdering anyone"
Negative Mitzvah 289
Exodus 20:13 — "You shall not murder"
​
V. No adultery
1 "Against [a man] having union with his mother."
Negative Mitzvah 330
Leviticus 18:7 — "She is your mother, do not act immodestly with her"
2 "Against [a man] having union with his sister."
Negative Mitzvah 331
Leviticus 18:8 — "Do not act immodestly with your father's wife"
3 "Against [a man] having union with the wife of his father."
Negative Mitzvah 332
Leviticus 18:9 — "Do not act immodestly...with your sister"
4 "Against [a man] having union with another man's wife."
Negative Mitzvah 347
Exodus 20:13 — "You shall not commit adultery"
5 "Against [a man] copulating with a beast."
Negative Mitzvah 348
Leviticus 18:23 — "Do not act indecently with an animal"
6 "Against a woman copulating with a beast."
Negative Mitzvah 349
Leviticus 18:23 "A woman may not act indecently with an animal"
7 "Against [a man] lying carnally with a male."
Negative Mitzvah 350
Leviticus 18:22 — "Do not have a relationship with a male as you would with a woman"
8 "Against [a man] lying carnally with his father."
Negative Mitzvah 351
Leviticus 18:7 — "Do not act immodestly with your father"
9 "Against [a man] lying carnally with his father's brother."
Negative Mitzvah 352
Leviticus 18:14 — "Do not act immodestly with your father's brother"
10 "Against engaging in erotic conduct that may lead to a prohibited union. [That is, petting by persons whose marriage would be illicit.]"
Negative Mitzvah 353
Leviticus 18:6 — "No person shall approach a close relative and act immodestly"
​
VI. Courts of justice
1 "To appoint judges and officers in each and every community."
Positive Mitzvah 176
Deuteronomy 16:18 — "Appoint judges and officers in all your gates"
2 "To treat the litigants equally before the law."
Positive Mitzvah 177
Leviticus 19:15 — "With righteousness, judge your neighbor"
3 "To inquire diligently into the testimony of a witness."
Positive Mitzvah 179
Deuteronomy 13:15 — "Then you shall inquire, search, and ask diligently"
4 "Against the wanton miscarriage of justice by the court."
Negative Mitzvah 273
Leviticus 19:15 — "You shall do no unrighteousness in judgment"
5 "Against the judge accepting a bribe or gift from a litigant."
Negative Mitzvah 274
Exodus 23:8 — "And you shall take no bribe"
6 "Against the judge showing marks of honour to but one litigant."
Negative Mitzvah 275
Leviticus 19:15 — "Nor honor an important person"
7 "Against the judge acting in fear of a litigant's threats."
Negative Mitzvah 276
Deuteronomy 1:17 — "You shall not be afraid because of any man"
8 "Against the judge, out of compassion, favouring a poor litigant."
Negative Mitzvah 277
Exodus 23:3 — "You shall not favor a poor man in his cause"
9 "Against the judge discriminating against the litigant because he is a sinner."
Negative Mitzvah 278
Exodus 23:6 — "You shall not pervert the judgment of the needy in his cause"
10 "Against the judge, out of softness, putting aside the penalty of a mauler or killer."
Negative Mitzvah 279
Deuteronomy 19:21 — "And your eye shall not have pity"
11 "Against the judge discriminating against a stranger or an orphan."
Negative Mitzvah 280
Deuteronomy 24:17 — "You shall not pervert the judgment of the stranger or the or the orphan
​
12 "Against the judge hearing one litigant in the absence of another."
Negative Mitzvah 281
Exodus 23:1 — "You shall not raise a false report"
13 "Against appointing a judge who lacks knowledge of the Law."
Negative Mitzvah 284
Deuteronomy 1:17 — "Do not respect persons in judgment"
14 "Against incrimination by circumstantial evidence."
Negative Mitzvah 290
Exodus 23:7 — "And the innocent and righteous you shall not slay"
15 "Against punishing for a crime committed under duress."
Negative Mitzvah 294
Deuteronomy 22:26 — "But to the girl you shall do nothing"
16 "That the court is to administer the death penalty by the sword [i.e., decapitation]."
Positive Mitzvah 226
Exodus 21:20 — "[The sin] shall surely be avenged"
17 "Against anyone taking the law into his own hands to kill the perpetrator of a capital crime."
Negative Mitzvah 292
Numbers 35:12 — "The murderer shall not die until he stands before the congregation in judgment"
18 "To testify in court."
Positive Mitzvah 178
Leviticus 5:1 — "And he is witness, whether he has seen or known of it"
19 "Against testifying falsely."
Negative Mitzvah 285
Exodus 20:13 — "You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor"
​
VII. No limb of a living animal
1 "Against eating a limb severed from a living animal, beast, or fowl."
Negative Mitzvah 182
Deuteronomy 12:23 — "And you may not eat the life with the meat"
2 "Against eating the flesh of any animal which was torn by a wild beast which, in part, prohibits the eating of such flesh as was torn off an animal while it was still alive."
​Negative Mitzvah 181
Exodus 22:30 — "Neither shall you eat any meat that is torn in the field"
​
​Reference: https://noahide.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/The-Noahide-Dinim-sub-Laws.html
​
At face value this might seem good. But it is a religious race ruling and dictating over others from a authoritarian standpoint with capital punishment as the judgment!!! And what is that punishment for Gentiles (Noahides)? Off with your head!
​
Revelation 20:4 - "And I saw thrones, and they sat upon them, and judgment was given unto them: and I saw the souls of them that were beheaded for the witness of Jesus, and for the word of God, and which had not worshipped the beast, neither his image, neither had received his mark upon their foreheads, or in their hands; and they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years."​
