Existing Sunday Laws
Enforcement of Sunday Laws Around the World
Sunday laws, often called “blue laws” refer to legal restrictions on Sunday activities, historically rooted in Christian customs of observing Sunday as a day of rest and worship. These laws can require businesses to close or limit hours on Sundays, ban certain types of work, or otherwise enforce Sunday as a non-working day. Over time, many Sunday laws have been justified on secular grounds (such as providing a uniform rest day for workers) even if they originated for religious reasons. Today, the enforcement of Sunday laws varies widely across the globe. Some countries maintain strict legal prohibitions on Sunday commerce and labor, while others have relaxed or abolished such rules in favor of economic activity or personal freedom. This report examines the legal frameworks, social pressures, economic impacts, and current debates surrounding Sunday laws in different countries, highlighting where enforcement remains especially strict and the motivations behind it.
Legal Frameworks in Different Countries
Globally, Sunday laws differ greatly. In many nations with a Christian heritage, older laws mandating Sunday rest have been rolled back, but several countries still legally enforce Sunday closures or restrictions. Key examples include:
​
• Germany: Germany has one of the strongest legal protections for Sundays. The German Basic Law (constitution) explicitly protects Sundays as days of rest and “spiritual improvement” . In practice, nearly all shops and businesses are closed on Sunday by law, with only essential services (e.g. hospitals, police, pharmacies, some restaurants) and a few exceptions (bakery mornings, flower shops, gas stations, etc.) operating. Even innovative unmanned retail stores (automated shops with no staff) have been forced shut on Sundays under these laws. This strict observance is often termed “Sonntagsruhe” (“Sunday rest”) and is deeply ingrained. German courts have consistently upheld Sunday closing regulations; for example, the Federal Constitutional Court ruled that Sunday must be “visibly” a day of rest for society . Enforcement is uniform nationwide, though each state can authorize a few “shopping Sundays” per year for special occasions.
• Poland: Poland instituted a nationwide Sunday trading ban starting in 2018, gradually tightening it to cover almost all Sundays by 2020 . Under the current law, most commercial activity is forbidden on Sundays, with only narrow exceptions (e.g. gas stations, pharmacies, cafes, florists, and some small family shops) . This law was championed by the Catholic Church and trade unions, emphasizing Sunday as a day for family and worship . The ban has been strictly enforced – authorities closed loopholes that some retailers tried to exploit (for instance, by declaring themselves postal outlets to qualify as exempt) . Violators can face fines. As of late 2024, however, Poland’s new government is reconsidering the ban amid public demand for more shopping hours. A bill has been proposed to allow two shopping Sundays per month, with mandatory double pay and an extra day off for Sunday workers . This reflects an ongoing debate between those who favor strict Sunday rest and those who prefer liberalized trading.
• Croatia: In 2023, Croatia passed a law severely restricting Sunday shopping, permitting stores to open on only 16 Sundays per year (the owners choose which) . For the other 36+ Sundays, shops must stay closed. There are limited exceptions – for instance, gas stations, shops in transport hubs, and small bakeries can operate with reduced hours . The government justified the law as ensuring retail workers get Sundays off for family time, even referring to Sunday as “His day” (God’s day) . Unions welcomed the change as securing a weekly day of rest for workers. However, many businesses have protested the law, arguing it threatens revenues – large shopping centers note that Sunday was their second-best sales day, accounting for about 20% of weekly turnover, so the ban could cost millions of euros.
Small shops in tourist areas also complain of lost business during peak season . Enforcement began in 2024 and is being closely watched amid these economic concerns.
• Norway: Norway maintains strict Sunday closing laws. By law, most retail stores cannot open on Sundays, with a few exceptions such as gas stations, garden centers, and very small grocery shops under 100 m² . Even these exceptions are tightly defined. The Norwegian government considered liberalizing Sunday trading in recent years, but the proposal met strong public and political resistance and was shelved . Thus, Sunday remains largely a day of rest in Norway by statute, and unauthorized opening can result in penalties.
• United Kingdom: The UK’s approach is moderate. In England and Wales, the Sunday Trading Act 1994 lifted the old outright ban and now allows large stores (over 280 m²) to open for up to 6 hours on Sundays, typically between 10am and 6pm . Small shops can trade freely with no hour limits . Certain sectors (pharmacies, petrol stations) are exempt from any restrictions. Similar rules apply in Northern Ireland. Scotland has no statutory limits on Sunday retail hours (though tradition keeps some closures). The law is actively enforced – big retailers adhere to the 6-hour rule . Notably, workers in England and Wales must voluntarily agree to Sunday work and can opt out with notice, and many retailers must pay a premium for Sunday shifts (a nod to labor rights). While the UK thus permits Sunday commerce, it still formally recognizes Sunday as a partial rest day through these trading hour limits.
• United States: The U.S. has no federal Sunday closing law, and blue laws are left to state and local governments. Today, enforcement is light and highly localized. Most states have eliminated broad Sunday trading bans, but a patchwork of sector-specific restrictions persists. For example, car dealerships are forbidden to operate on Sundays in about half of U.S. states (e.g. in New Jersey, Illinois, Texas, etc.) . Many states also restrict Sunday alcohol sales – often prohibiting liquor sales on Sunday or limiting the hours (e.g. no sales before noon) . A few communities still prohibit most retail on Sunday (famously, Bergen County, New Jersey, bans selling clothing, furniture, electronics and more on Sundays) . Such laws are relics of earlier strict blue laws; violations can incur fines, but enforcement usually involves occasional inspections. Culturally, large parts of the U.S. treat Sunday as a normal shopping day – malls and stores open nationwide – except where these niche rules apply. Courts have generally upheld state Sunday laws so long as they have a secular rationale (like providing a uniform rest day), not purely religious intent . Many remaining blue laws (for example, bans on hunting or car sales on Sunday) are defended as promoting rest or safety, and while not heavily policed, they do remain on the books in certain states.
• Other Regions: In much of the world, formal Sunday restrictions are minimal. Latin American countries, for instance, have no widespread Sunday closing laws – by the 1980s, it became common for businesses in countries like Brazil, Argentina, Chile, and Colombia to open on Sundays, and today most malls and supermarkets in South America operate every Sunday . In Asia, predominantly non-Christian countries do not enforce Sunday rest (Sunday is a regular business day in countries like China, Japan, etc., though Christian minority communities there may voluntarily observe it). Notably, in the Middle East the weekend falls on Friday or Saturday in many nations; Sunday is a normal workday in countries like Israel or UAE, so “Sunday laws” are not applicable there. On the other hand, some religiously observant nations enforce a weekly day of rest on a different day (e.g. Israel’s strict Saturday (Sabbath) laws), which are analogous to Sunday laws but for a different holy day.
These examples underscore that the legal treatment of weekly rest depends on cultural context – with Sunday laws primarily a feature of Christian-influenced societies.
Social and Cultural Enforcement Mechanisms
Legal mandates aside, social and cultural factors strongly influence Sunday observance. In countries with strict Sunday laws, community norms and religious pressures often reinforce compliance:
• Religious Influence: Many Sunday closing laws have backing from religious groups. For instance, the Catholic Church in Poland was instrumental in pushing for the trading ban, framing it as necessary to keep Sunday holy and family-oriented. Polish officials explicitly stated that Sunday is for “family and prayer, not shopping.” In Croatia as well, leaders invoked religious language about dedicating Sunday to God . Even where laws are relaxed, churches and Sabbatarian organizations may informally pressure businesses to close. In parts of the United States Bible Belt, it’s common for communities to expect Sundays free of work aside from church – many businesses voluntarily close on Sundays due to local custom or owner’s faith (for example, the Chick-fil-A and Hobby Lobby chains close every Sunday nationwide for religious reasons, despite no law requiring it). This kind of voluntary compliance stems from cultural norms that treat Sunday as sacred time.
• Community Norms and Peer Pressure: In some regions, informal enforcement is powerful. For example, in rural Germany and Switzerland, even beyond legal requirements, there is a strong cultural norm of Ruhetag (rest day) on Sunday. Neighbors may frown upon loud activities like mowing the lawn or doing construction on Sundays – these “quiet hours” customs are sometimes backed by local ordinances. In the UK’s Hebrides (Scotland), due to the influence of the Free Church of Scotland, there has traditionally been virtually no commercial activity on Sundays, even without strict laws, simply because the community expects observance . Such social enforcement can make Sunday laws effectively stricter: people comply not just out of legal duty but out of respect for tradition or fear of community disapproval.
• Labor Unions and Worker Preferences: Not only religious groups, but trade unions and workers’ organizations also play a role in enforcing or supporting Sunday rest. Unions in the retail sector often advocate for Sunday to be a guaranteed day off. In Croatia, the retail workers’ union fought for years to curb Sunday trading, arguing employees deserve that day with their families . Similarly, in France and Germany, unions have allied with religious and family organizations to resist extended Sunday hours, framing it as a workers’ rights issue. This creates social pressure on employers – even where Sunday opening is allowed, some employers choose to stay closed or limit hours to avoid antagonizing workers or unions. In countries like Sweden (which has no legal ban but a tradition of Sunday rest), many workers simply prefer not to work Sundays, and employers accommodate this, reflecting a cultural value on weekends. Overall, cultural expectations (family time, worship, rest) strongly supplement legal enforcement in many places, ensuring that Sunday remains distinct, whether by law or by choice.
Economic Impact of Sunday Laws
Sunday laws have significant economic implications, and debates often center on balancing economic activity with social welfare:
• Retail and Business Revenue: Mandatory Sunday closings can reduce weekly sales for retailers, especially in sectors like shopping malls and supermarkets where weekends are peak trading times. For example, Croatian shopping centers warn that banning most Sunday trade could cost them around €50 million in lost annual revenue, as Sunday was among their busiest days . In Poland, the ban prompted consumers to crowd stores on Saturdays or spend money online, leading some to argue that brick-and-mortar retailers were disadvantaged.
Cross-border shopping is another effect: Austrians, for instance, often drove into neighboring countries with liberal Sunday hours (like the Czech Republic or Italy) to shop on Sundays , meaning domestic businesses lose out. On the other hand, some small businesses support Sunday closures because it levels the playing field. They don’t have to compete or pay staff 7 days a week, and they might gain customers on weekdays instead of losing them to big stores on Sunday.
• Labor Costs and Worker Welfare: Enforcing Sunday as a rest day can benefit workers by guaranteeing them time off. This is often seen as improving quality of life and family cohesion. Some studies even suggest working on Sundays can be detrimental to worker health, correlating with higher sickness and absenteeism rates in businesses that operate seven days a week . From this perspective, Sunday laws may reduce burnout and healthcare costs. However, workers who rely on weekend pay or overtime might lose income if hours are curtailed. Many jurisdictions mitigate this by requiring premium pay for Sunday work. For example, proposals in Poland would mandate double pay for those working on newly allowed Sundays, and in the UK many large stores pay extra for Sunday shifts. These higher labor costs mean that if Sunday opening is allowed, it’s more expensive for businesses and some may choose to stay closed because the added revenue wouldn’t offset paying overtime. Thus, Sunday laws (or the lack thereof) can influence wage patterns and employment. Proponents also claim that allowing Sunday trade creates more jobs; indeed, Polish economists estimated ending the ban could create up to 40,000 retail jobs nationwide, whereas unions counter that those jobs might just be spreading existing work more thinly.
• Consumers and Tourism: There is an economic argument about consumer convenience and tourism. In tourist-heavy economies (France, Spain, parts of Italy), relaxed Sunday trading in designated tourist zones has been used to capture visitor spending. Major cities like Paris, Madrid, and Rome now often allow Sunday shopping, at least in central areas, to cater to tourists and boost sales. Conversely, where Sunday laws are strict, tourists may find closed shops – e.g. visitors to Germany or Poland on a Sunday might be surprised to find almost all stores shut, potentially reducing tourist spending. For local consumers, strict Sunday closures can be inconvenient, leading to public pressure to change laws. In Poland, by 2023 many shoppers were calling for an extra shopping day on Sunday, showing that consumer sentiment can shift when people value convenience over tradition. However, others enjoy the calm of a no-shopping Sunday, and in some surveys (for example, in Germany and Austria) the public largely supports keeping Sunday free of commercial hustle, valuing the social benefit over the economic. This ongoing tug-of-war between economic gain and social/rest values is at the heart of Sunday law debates.
Notable Legal Challenges and Debates
Sunday laws have prompted legal challenges and public debates in many countries, especially where they intersect with religious freedom or economic rights:
• Constitutional Challenges: A famous case in Canada struck down Sunday closing laws on religious freedom grounds. The federal Lord’s Day Act, which mandated most businesses close on Sunday, was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court of Canada in 1985 (R. v. Big M Drug Mart). The Court found the law’s primary purpose was religious to compel observance of the "Christian Sabbath" and thus it infringed freedom of religion for non-Christians. After this ruling, Canadian provinces rapidly repealed or relaxed remaining Sunday laws. In the United States, by contrast, the Supreme Court upheld Sunday laws in a series of 1961 cases (e.g. McGowan v. Maryland), reasoning that a “common day of rest” has a secular, civil benefit for society’s welfare.
The Court noted that providing a uniform day off, even if Sunday, was within the government’s power and did not necessarily establish religion. These differing legal outcomes highlight an ongoing debate: are Sunday laws a violation of the separation of church and state, or are they permissible labor regulations? In Europe, the issue has also arisen; the European Court of Justice in 1996 struck down an EU directive’s clause favoring Sunday rest, stating the EU had not justified why Sunday, specifically, was essential for worker health as opposed to any other day.
• Political and Public Debates: Changes to Sunday trading rules often spur intense public discourse. In Hungary, the government imposed a strict Sunday closure law in 2015, citing Christian values, but it proved highly unpopular. Businesses and the public pushed back, and opposition parties even threatened a referendum. Facing pressure, the government performed an abrupt U-turn and repealed the ban after one year. This reversal in 2016 illustrates that without broad public consent, strict Sunday laws can falter. The UK saw heated debate in Parliament in the 1980s and early 1990s over introducing Sunday shopping; traditionalists (including some church groups and trade unions) formed the “Keep Sunday Special” campaign to oppose liberalization . Although the compromise 6-hour law passed, occasional attempts to further extend hours (such as during the 2012 Olympics and a proposal in 2015 to devolve Sunday hours to local councils) have been contentious. In Poland, the recent elections essentially became a referendum on the Sunday ban, with the winning parties campaigning to relax the law in response to popular sentiment. Courts have also been involved in enforcement debates – Poland’s Supreme Court in 2023 ruled against creative attempts by stores to circumvent the ban, reinforcing the legislature’s intent. All these examples show Sunday laws are a dynamic topic: shifts in social values, political leadership, or economic conditions can quickly ignite controversy over whether such laws should be tightened, maintained, or abolished.
Countries with Especially Strict Sunday Law Enforcement
While many nations have moved toward flexibility, several countries stand out for the forceful enforcement of Sunday laws. The motivations range from religious tradition to labor rights. Below are some of the strictest cases:
• Poland: Enforcement Level: Very strict (nationwide ban on almost all Sunday trade since 2020). Key Restrictions: Virtually all shops must close on Sunday; only exceptions are for essential services and small family-run stores. No requirement to attend church, but the law’s intent is clearly to observe Sunday rest. Motivations: A blend of religious and social reasons. Poland is a predominantly Catholic country, and the Catholic Church, along with the Solidarity trade union, lobbied strongly for the Sunday closing law. They framed it as protecting Sunday for worship and family time. Additionally, proponents argued workers deserve a guaranteed day off. Public Sentiment: Divided. Traditionalists and many older or rural Poles support the law, aligning with church teachings. However, a large portion of consumers (especially in cities) found the ban inconvenient, and businesses saw it as harmful – by 2023 there were loud calls from the public to restore an “extra shopping day” on Sunday . The recent change in government indicates a swing in public mood toward easing the restrictions. Thus, Poland is a prime example of strict legal enforcement rooted in religious-cultural norms, now clashing with modern economic and social pressures.
• Germany: Enforcement Level: Strict. Germany has some of the toughest Sunday laws in Europe, embedded in its constitution. Key Restrictions: No regular commerce on Sundays – malls, grocery stores, and most businesses stay closed. Only essential and leisure activities operate (restaurants, museums, hospitals, etc.), and even those must compensate workers with alternate rest days.
There are typically only a handful of “open Sundays” each year, granted by local authorities for special events. Motivations: Cultural/Religious and Labor Rights. Germany’s Sunday laws date back to religious observance (the influence of "Christian Sabbatarianism"), and Sunday is widely seen as part of the national culture (often described as “heilig” or sacred). Churches (both Catholic and Protestant) strongly favor the laws. At the same time, labor unions and many citizens champion Sunday as a work-free family day, a cornerstone of work-life balance. The policy is often justified in secular terms as preserving social welfare and community life. Public Sentiment: Largely supportive, with some urban dissent. Many Germans have adapted to plan around Sunday closings, and there is broad acceptance of the calm Sunday provides. Surveys and social media often find people defending Ruhetag against “consumerism.” Still, some economists and retailers occasionally argue for liberalization (especially during economic downturns or like during COVID-19 recovery), and younger urban populations used to 24/7 convenience may favor change. So far, though, political attempts to expand Sunday hours have failed amid public resistance and constitutional protection.
• Norway: Enforcement Level: Strict. National law keeps most commerce closed every Sunday. Key Restrictions: Only small grocery stores, gas stations, and a few niche retailers can open on Sundays, generally to serve basic needs; everything else (department stores, shopping centers) is shut. Motivations: Cultural/Labor. Though Norway is a secular country in practice, the Sunday holiday tradition remains strong, stemming from both Lutheran heritage and a consensus on protecting workers’ leisure time. The government’s attempt to loosen Sunday trading met widespread popular resistance, indicating that Norwegians value the status quo. Public Sentiment: Supportive of closure. Polls and the reaction to reform efforts suggest that a significant portion of the public, as well as unions, prefer keeping Sunday as a quiet day. Thus, Norway’s enforcement is strict not just because of law but because society itself insists on it.
• Croatia: Enforcement Level: Strict (new law greatly limiting Sunday openings). Key Restrictions: Only 16 Sundays per year can a shop open (chosen at the owner’s discretion); all other Sundays are mandatory rest for retail. Essential services and some tourist-oriented businesses are exempted within limits. Motivations: Religious and Social. Croatia is another majority Catholic nation; respect for Sunday is part of cultural tradition. The government explicitly cited improving family life for workers and even boosting church attendance as reasons – critics accused the prime minister of trying to funnel people into pews by shutting shops . Unions also backed the law as giving exhausted retail workers a break. Public Sentiment: Mixed/Controversial. Many workers and conservative citizens welcomed the law, but a significant number of entrepreneurs and consumers are unhappy. Since the law is recent (2023), debate is ongoing – with small businesses in tourist areas and large retailers both warning of revenue loss and job cuts . The clash here is between a strong cultural push for a “day of rest” and the economic importance of tourism and weekend commerce.
• Tonga: Enforcement Level: Extremely strict – perhaps the most stringent in the world. Key Restrictions: The South Pacific Kingdom of Tonga literally prohibits almost all work or commercial activity on Sunday by law. The nation’s constitution itself declares the Sabbath (Sunday) sacred forever and forbids anyone from pursuing their trade or business on that day. This means not only are stores closed, but even recreational activities can be banned if deemed work-like. (It’s said one cannot even legally fish or play competitive sports on Sunday in Tonga.) Only essential operations (emergency services, etc.) are allowed. Motivations: Deeply Religious.
​
Tonga’s laws were inspired by 19th-century Methodist missionary influence and the strong Christian (Methodist and Wesleyan) identity of the nation. Sunday observance is enforced as a matter of faith and national identity. Public Sentiment: Broadly accepting. Tongans generally uphold the Sunday ban as part of their culture as the day is devoted to church and rest. While some inconveniences exist (e.g. travelers have noted the whole country “shuts down” on Sundays), there is pride in this uniqueness. The law is actively enforced (with fines or even jail for violations) and community compliance is high. Tonga illustrates a case where religious motivation dominates there and it virtually has no secular challenge to the practice.
​
(Other countries once had strict Sunday laws. For example, Israel for Saturdays, and regions of the U.S. in the past. But the above are among the strictest Sunday-specific regimes in for
Comparison of Sunday Law Enforcement by Country
The table below compares selected countries on how rigorously they enforce Sunday laws, summarizing key restrictions and public attitudes:
Country Enforcement Level Key Restrictions Public Sentiment
Poland —Very strict (2018–present) Almost all retail trading banned on Sundays; only small exceptions (fuel, pharmacies, cafés, etc.). Divided – Church and unions support the ban for family/church time, but many consumers and businesses oppose it; new government plans to relax law amid public pressure.
​
Germany — Very strict (long-standing) Nationwide “Ruhetag”: shops closed every Sunday by law ; only essential services open. A few Sunday openings per year allowed by local permit. Generally supportive – Seen as cultural norm and workers’ right; churches and unions strongly in favor. Some urban economic voices call for change, but tradition remains popular.
Croatia Strict (since 2023) Only 16 Sundays/year per store allowed; all other Sundays are non-working for retail. Exemptions for essential and tourist needs (limited hours). Contentious – Many workers enjoy guaranteed rest day, and religious advocates approve. However, retailers (especially small and tourism-based) and some shoppers are unhappy with lost income and convenience.
Norway Strict Sunday retail banned except small grocery shops (under 100 m²), gas stations, florists, etc. Most businesses closed by law on Sundays. Largely supportive – Public and political resistance to liberalizing Sunday trade is strong . Society values Sunday quiet time, so there’s little push for change.
United Kingdom (England / Wales) — Moderate Large stores may open max 6 hours on Sunday (e.g. 10am–4pm); small shops free of hours limits. Certain retail sectors are exempt from any limit. Work on Sunday is generally voluntary with premium pay. Sunday restrictions are generally accepting, as compromise is seen as balancing commerce and rest. Some campaigns by major retailers and economists to extend hours, and by others to “keep Sunday special,” but no major public outrage either way.
United States (varies by state) — Low/Minimal (most areas) No broad bans nationally; selective blue laws remain (e.g. many states bar car sales or morning alcohol sales on Sunday). Most retail and services operate as normal nationally. Most Americans take Sunday shopping for granted and see blue laws as antiquated. However, religious communities often approve of remaining restrictions. Generally, little public focus on changing these minor laws (many are being slowly repealed over time).
Tonga —Extremely strict Constitutional ban on nearly all work, business, and even recreation on Sunday. Only essential services allowed; violators face fines or jail. Strongly supportive as they observe Sunday as holy as a national value. The culture embraces the day for church and rest, so there’s high compliance and pride in the law (despite some inconvenience for visitors or commerce).​
Conclusion
Around the world, Sunday laws reflect a tension between tradition and modernity.
​
In places like Poland, Germany, and Tonga, we see a continuing commitment to the age-old idea that one day a week should be set aside for rest, worship, and family; whether for religious devotion or workers’ rights. These societies enforce Sunday observance through both legal means and cultural consensus, often with positive intentions of preserving social well being. On the other hand, many countries have chosen a more flexible path, prioritizing economic activity and personal choice, especially as 24/7 consumer culture and diverse work schedules become the norm. The global trend in recent decades has been toward liberalization of Sunday activities (as seen in much of the Americas, Asia, and parts of Europe), yet the debate is far from settled. Public sentiment remains split. Some cherish the slower pace of a Sunday with shuttered shops, while others see mandated closings as anachronistic or restrictive. Legal challenges continue to test how to reconcile Sunday laws with constitutional principles in various jurisdictions.
In summary, enforcement of Sunday laws today ranges from very strict to virtually nonexistent, depending on local values. Countries with strong religious or cultural traditions of Sunday rest and active labor protections tend to enforce such laws vigorously, whereas more secular and economically driven societies have mostly done away with them. The motivations behind enforcement whether they are religious observance, cultural identity, protection of workers, or support for small businesses are key to understanding why Sunday laws persist in some places. As lifestyles and economies evolve, each society is re-examining what Sunday means to them, ensuring the conversation around “to shop or not to shop” on Sundays remains a lively one.
Summary of Penalties and Fines
​
Below is a ranking of regions with Sunday laws, including the typical penalties for violations and a note on which U.S. jurisdiction is among the strictest:
1. Tonga
• Penalties: Violators face fines and even imprisonment.
• Reason: Tonga’s constitutional mandate prohibits nearly all work or commerce on Sunday, with very severe sanctions to ensure the day remains entirely free for religious observance.
2. Germany
• Penalties: Unauthorized Sunday operations can result in significant administrative fines.
• Reason: With Sunday enshrined as a day of rest in its constitution, Germany enforces its “Ruhetag” robustly—shops are closed except for very limited exceptions, and breaches are met with strict financial penalties.
3. Poland
• Penalties: Businesses that open illegally on Sunday are subject to heavy fines and strict administrative action.
• Reason: A nationwide ban on most retail activity leaves only a few narrow exceptions; enforcement is rigorous, reflecting strong cultural and religious support for keeping Sunday as a day of rest.
4. Norway
• Penalties: Fines are imposed on establishments that violate Sunday closure rules.
• Reason: Although some small outlets and essential services can operate, the law is clear and its enforcement leaves little room for large-scale commercial activity on Sundays.
5. Croatia
• Penalties: Violations are punished with fines when shops exceed the allowed 16 open Sundays per year.
• Reason: Recent legislation strictly limits retail operations on Sundays to preserve the day for rest, even though some exceptions exist; enforcement via fines is taken seriously.
6. United Kingdom
• Penalties: Large retailers exceeding the 6‑hour Sunday trading limit can face fines, and regulatory bodies monitor compliance.
• Reason: While there are statutory restrictions (such as the 6‑hour rule for large stores), smaller shops operate freely. The UK’s enforcement is moderate compared to the stricter regimes above.
7. United States
• Penalties: Enforcement varies by state and locality. For example, some states impose fines on specific sectors (like car dealerships or alcohol vendors) that violate blue laws.
• Reason: Most of the U.S. has moved away from broad Sunday restrictions, leaving only patchwork blue laws. However, New Jersey is often cited as one of the strictest states—particularly in areas like car sales and alcohol trading—where violations can result in comparatively high fines and tighter local enforcement.
​
For the latest coverage on Sunday laws in the USA by state, go here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_laws_in_the_United_States